CROFT

CROFT v. GTT COMMUNICATIONS, INC.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 10, 20213:21-cv-01083California5,667 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 AARON CROFT, Case No. 21-cv-01083-EMC

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

v. MOTION TO REMAND

GTT COMMUNICATIONS, INC., et al., Docket No. 15 Defendants.

12 13 Plaintiff Aaron Croft has sued his former employer, GTT Communications, Inc., and his former supervisor there, Eric Cohen, for employment discrimination. Mr. Croft initially filed suit in state court. GTT removed the case, arguing that there is diversity jurisdiction once the citizenship of Mr. Cohen, who was fraudulently joined, is ignored. (Both Mr. Croft and Mr. Cohen are citizens of California.) Currently pending before the Court is Mr. Croft’s motion to remand. Having considered the parties’ briefs and the oral argument of counsel, the Court hereby DENIES the motion. I. FACTUAL & PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND A. Complaint In his complaint, Mr. Croft alleges as follows. GTT is a company that provides internet service. See…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.