Craven
Craven v. Robertson
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 KALVINN. CRAVEN, Case No. 20-cy-01933-SI Petitioner, Vv. ORDER SUA SPONTE STAYING AND
ABEYING CASE AND
JIM ROBERTSON, ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSING
CASE
Respondent. wg 12 Petitioner has informed the Court that on April 27, 2021, he filed a new state court habeas 13 = petition seeking to exhaust a number of new claims. Dkt. No. 34. As such, the Court finds it
appropriate to sua sponte stay and abey this petition. See Rhines v. Weber, 544 U.S. 269, 277-78 15 (2005). 16 = Accordingly, this action is STAYED and the clerk shall ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSE 17 = the action. Nothing further will take place in this action until petitioner exhausts the unexhausted 18 claims and, within thirty days of doing so, moves to reopen this action, lift the Court’s stay and 19 proceed with consideration of his habeas petition. Petitioner must promptly return to federal court 20 after his…