Zarco

Zarco v. VWR International, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 13, 20214:20-cv-00089-HSGCalifornia5,874 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 EMMANUEL ZARCO, Case No. 20-cv-00089-HSG Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

MOTION FOR SUMMARY

v. JUDGMENT VWR INTERNATIONAL, LLC, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 39 Defendants. 12 Plaintiff Emmanuel Zarco brings this suit against VWR International, LLC (“VWR”), Avantor, Inc., and Avantor Performance Materials, Inc. (together, “Defendants”) alleging violations of the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (“FEHA”), the California Family Rights Act (“CFRA”), and public policy. Dkt. No. 1, Ex. 1 (“Compl.”) ¶¶ 21–56. Pending before the Court is Defendants’ motion for summary judgment. See Dkt. No. 39 (“Mot.”), 48 (“Opp.”), 49 (“Reply”). For the reasons explained below, the Court GRANTS Defendants’ motion. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Emmanuel Zarco began working for VWR as a chemical tracking coordinator in March 2016. Dkt. No. 48-1, Declaration of Jason M. Erlich (“Erlich Decl.”), Ex. 2. VWR is “a global…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.