Twitter, Inc. v. Voip-Pal.com, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 TWITTER, INC., Case No. 20-cv-02397-LHK (VKD)

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE MAY 7, 2021 DISCOVERY

v. DISPUTE LETTER

VOIP-PAL.COM, INC., Re: Dkt. No. 72 Defendant.

13 The parties dispute whether plaintiff Twitter, Inc. (“Twitter”) violated applicable law and the protective order by using and disclosing certain of the parties’ settlement communications in this action in a separate action, Twitter, Inc. v. VoIP-Pal.com, Inc., Case No. 21-cv-2769-JD (“Twitter II”). Neither party requests a hearing, and the Court finds that the dispute may be determined without one. Civil L.R. 7-1(b). As explained below, the Court finds no violation. I. BACKGROUND Defendant VoIP-Pal.com, Inc. (“VoIP-Pal”) asserts that paragraphs 12, 44, 45, 46, 48, and 55 of the complaint in Twitter II disclose VoIP-Pal’s confidential settlement communications with Twitter in connection with this action…