Picetti
Picetti v. STRYKER CORPORATION, a Michigan corporation
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ROBERT PICETTI, Case No. 20-cv-07454-MMC
Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S v. MOTION TO REMAND
STRYKER CORPORATION, et al., Defendants.
12 Before the Court is plaintiff Robert Picetti's ("Picetti") Motion to Remand, filed November 24, 2020. Defendants Stryker Corporation ("Stryker") and Howmedica Osteonics Corp. ("Howmedica") have filed opposition, to which Picetti has replied.1 Having read and considered the papers filed in support of and in opposition to the motion, the Court hereby rules as follows.2 BACKGROUND In his Complaint, initially filed in state court on November 26, 2019, Picetti alleges "[d]efendants, jointly and severally, employed [him] from approximately August of 2016 to September of 2017" and "paid [him] wholly or in-part on a commission basis." (See Compl. ¶¶ 17, 18.) According to Picetti, defendants "failed to compensate [him] for all hours worked,…