Robledo

Robledo v. Allison

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 18, 20213:20-cv-09134California1,476 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ANTHONY J ROBLEDO, Case No. 20-cv-09134-WHO

Plaintiff,

ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT

v. WITH LEAVE TO AMEND

KATHLEEN ALLISON, et al., Defendant

12 INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Anthony Robledo alleges that his Eighth Amendment rights were violated by officials at San Quentin State Prison (“SQSP”) and California Institute for Men (“CIM”), executives at the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (“CDCR”), and a court-appointed federal receiver. His 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint containing these allegations is now before me for review pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). Robledo names more than a dozen defendants without tying each defendant to a wrongful act. Robledo also pleads unrelated claims, which is impermissible. He will be given leave to amend to correct these deficiencies. LEGAL STANDARD A federal court must conduct a preliminary screening in any case in which a 25 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.