Conner

Conner v. Quora, Inc., a Delaware corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 19, 20215:18-cv-07597California333 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 JERI CONNOR, Case No. 18-cv-07597-BLF

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

v. RELIEF FROM NONDISPOSITIVE

PRETRIAL ORDER OF MAGISTRATE

QUORA, INC., JUDGE Defendant. [Re: ECF 237]

Before the Court is Defendant Quora, Inc.’s motion for relief from a non-dispositive pretrial order of Magistrate Judge Nathanael M. Cousins, pursuant to Local Civil Rule 72-2. See Mot., ECF 237. Quora challenges Judge Cousins’s denial of its motion to compel a forensic examination of Plaintiff Jeri Connor’s electronic devices she used to access Quora on the bases that the decision was clearly erroneous and contrary to law. Id. 2. Quora argues that it addressed 17 all the details Judge Cousins found lacking in its proposal and that his alleged lack of reasoning 18 for the decision makes it contrary to law. Id. 3-4. 19 A magistrate judge’s non-dispositive pretrial order may be modified or…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.