Tate
Tate v. Delgadillo
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 19, 20215:20-cv-09476California1,653 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
DEREK TATE,
Case No. 20-09476 EJD (PR) Plaintiff, ORDER STRIKING NON-
COGNIZABLE CLAIMS; OF
v. SERVICE; DIRECTING
DEFENDANT TO FILE
DISPOSITIVE MOTION OR
D. DELGADILLO, et al., NOTICE REGARDING SUCH
MOTION; INSTRUCTIONS TO Defendants. CLERK
18 Plaintiff, a state prisoner, filed the instant pro se civil rights action pursuant to 42 19 U.S.C. § 1983 against a correctional officer at Salinas Valley State Prison (“SVSP”) and 20 two inmates. Dkt. No. 1 at 2. The Court dismissed the complaint with leave to amend for 21 Plaintiff to attempt to correct deficiencies with respect to an equal protection claim. Dkt. 22 No. 9 at 3-4. The claims against the two inmates were dismissed. Id. at 4. In the 23 alternative, Plaintiff was advised that he could file notice that he wishes to proceed on the 24 cognizable First Amendment and Eighth Amendment…