Jericho Nicolas v. Uber Technologies, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
JERICHO NICOLAS, et al., Case No. 19-cv-08228-PJH Plaintiffs,
v. ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO
DISMISS THIRD AMENDED
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., COMPLAINT Defendant. Re: Dkt. No. 46
Defendant Uber Technologies, Inc.’s (“defendant”) motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ Mark Glinoga (“Glinoga”), Alexis Gonzalez (“Gonzalez”), and Kevin Neely (“Neely”) (collectively, “plaintiffs”) third amended complaint (Dkt. 46) came on for hearing before this court on February 25, 2021. Plaintiffs appeared through their counsel, Ron Zambrano and Melineh Kasbarian. Defendant appeared through its counsel, Theane Evangelis. Having read the parties’ papers and carefully considered their arguments and the relevant legal authority, and good cause appearing, the court hereby GRANTS defendant’s motion. BACKGROUND This case is a putative wage and hour class action premised on the alleged violation of various…