Jericho Nicolas v. Uber Technologies, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 20, 20214:19-cv-08228California6,750 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JERICHO NICOLAS, et al., Case No. 19-cv-08228-PJH Plaintiffs,

v. ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

DISMISS THIRD AMENDED

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., COMPLAINT Defendant. Re: Dkt. No. 46

Defendant Uber Technologies, Inc.’s (“defendant”) motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ Mark Glinoga (“Glinoga”), Alexis Gonzalez (“Gonzalez”), and Kevin Neely (“Neely”) (collectively, “plaintiffs”) third amended complaint (Dkt. 46) came on for hearing before this court on February 25, 2021. Plaintiffs appeared through their counsel, Ron Zambrano and Melineh Kasbarian. Defendant appeared through its counsel, Theane Evangelis. Having read the parties’ papers and carefully considered their arguments and the relevant legal authority, and good cause appearing, the court hereby GRANTS defendant’s motion. BACKGROUND This case is a putative wage and hour class action premised on the alleged violation of various…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.