Kurisu

Kurisu v. Svenhard Swedish Bakery Supplemental Key Management Retirement Plan

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 21, 20213:20-cv-06409California450 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 KERRY KURISU, et al., Case No. 20-cv-06409-EMC

Plaintiffs,

ORDER RE SUPPLEMENTAL

v. BRIEFING ON VENUE AND

SCHEDULING STATUS

SVENHARD SWEDISH BAKERY CONFERENCE

SUPPLEMENTAL KEY MANAGEMENT

RETIREMENT PLAN, et al., Docket Nos. 38-

Defendants.

13 14 The Court has reviewed the parties’ supplemental briefs regarding venue. Having considered such, the Court concludes that a § 1404(a) transfer of the entire action to the District of Oregon would not be proper. The three individual defendants who have appeared in this case (Mr. Svenhard, Mr. Kunkel, and Mr. Kohles) do not consent to transfer to Oregon, and there is no indication that the claims against them could have been brought in Oregon. See 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) (providing that, “[f]or convenience of parties and witnesses, in the interest of justice, a district court may transfer any civil action to any other district or division where it might have been…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.