Kurisu
Kurisu v. Svenhard Swedish Bakery Supplemental Key Management Retirement Plan
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 KERRY KURISU, et al., Case No. 20-cv-06409-EMC
Plaintiffs,
ORDER RE SUPPLEMENTAL
v. BRIEFING ON VENUE AND
SCHEDULING STATUS
SVENHARD SWEDISH BAKERY CONFERENCE
SUPPLEMENTAL KEY MANAGEMENT
RETIREMENT PLAN, et al., Docket Nos. 38-
Defendants.
13 14 The Court has reviewed the parties’ supplemental briefs regarding venue. Having considered such, the Court concludes that a § 1404(a) transfer of the entire action to the District of Oregon would not be proper. The three individual defendants who have appeared in this case (Mr. Svenhard, Mr. Kunkel, and Mr. Kohles) do not consent to transfer to Oregon, and there is no indication that the claims against them could have been brought in Oregon. See 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) (providing that, “[f]or convenience of parties and witnesses, in the interest of justice, a district court may transfer any civil action to any other district or division where it might have been…