Holley

Holley v. Gilead Sciences, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 19, 20214:18-cv-06972California1,299 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ADRIAN HOLLEY, et al., Case No. 18-cv-06972-JST (JSC)

Plaintiffs,

ORDER FOLLOWING MAY 18, 2021

v. DISCOVERY CONFERENCE

GILEAD SCIENCES, INC., et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 626, 627, 656, 657, 672, 673, Defendants. 679, 680

12 The Court held a video discovery hearing with the parties on May 18, 2021. As discussed at the hearing, the Court rules on the pending discovery disputes as follows. 1. Dkt. Nos. 656, 657 Defendants ask the Court to retroactively impose $500 per day monetary sanctions for each plaintiff that has not submitted what Defendants deem fully completed medical authorizations and declarations as required by the Plaintiff Fact Sheet Case Management Order (PFS CMO). The request is DENIED. First, as the Court stated at the April 1, 2021 hearing, Defendants had not raised the issue in writing in advance of the April 1 hearing. (Dkt. No. 644 at 9-10.) While Plaintiffs agreed to provide updated…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.