Dunn
Dunn v. Santa Cruz County
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 8 GREGORY EDWIN DUNN, Case No. 21-cv-02091-BLF
Plaintiff,
ORDER SCREENING PLAINTIFF’S
v. FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e); SANTA CRUZ COUNTY, DISMISSING FIRST AMENDED
COMPLAINT WITHOUT LEAVE TO
Defendant. AMEND; AND DISMISSING ACTION
WITH PREJUDICE
16 Before the Court is the first amended complaint (“FAC”) filed by Plaintiff Gregory Edwin Dunn (“Dunn”). See FAC, ECF 7. Because Dunn is proceeding in forma pauperis (“IFP”), the Court is required to screen the FAC to determine whether it states a claim upon which relief may be granted. The Court concludes that the FAC does not state a claim for relief and that amendment would be futile. Accordingly, the FAC is DISMISSED WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND and the action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. I. BACKGROUND Dunn filed this action against Defendant Santa Cruz County on March…