Johnson v. Camden Almaden, LLC
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SCOTT JOHNSON, Case No. 20-CV-06514-LHK
Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING FOR LACK OF
JURISDICTION EX PARTE
v. APPLICATION FOR ENTRY OF
STIPULATED JUDGMENT
CAMDEN ALMADEN, LLC,, Re: Dkt. No. 18 Defendant. 16 On February 4, 2021, the parties filed a joint stipulation for dismissal pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). ECF No. 17. The stipulation “neither expressly reserve[d] jurisdiction nor incorporate[d] the terms of [a] settlement agreement.” Hagestad v. Tragesser, 49 F.3d 1430, 1433 (9th Cir. 1995) (vacating order enforcing settlement for lack of subject matter jurisdiction). Rather, the stipulation in its entirety provided as follows: Pursuant to F.R.CIV.P.41 (a)(1)(A)(ii), IT IS STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto that this action may be dismissed with prejudice as to all parties; each party to bear his/her/its own attorneys’ fees and costs. This stipulation is made as …