Dixon

Dixon v. Imprisonment Vacaville Wardens

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 25, 20213:21-cv-03350California583 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 MARK LYDELL DIXON, V96657, Case No. 21-cv-03350-CRB (PR)

Petitioner, ORDER DISMISSING PETITION FOR

A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

v. WITHOUT PREJUDICE AND

DENYING A CERTIFICATE OF

WARDEN, APPEALABILITY Respondent.

I. Petitioner, a state prisoner incarcerated at the California Medical Facility (CMF) in Vacaville, has filed a pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 challenging the decision of CMF medical officials to involuntarily medicate him. II. Federal law opens two main avenues to relief on claims related to imprisonment: a petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254, and a complaint for violation of federal civil rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Hill v. McDonough, 547 U.S. 573, 579 (2006). Habeas is the “exclusive remedy” for the prisoner who seeks “immediate or speedier release from…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.