Harris

Harris v. Broomfield

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 25, 20214:21-cv-00283California3,520 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 MAURICE LYDELL HARRIS, Case No. 21-cv-00283-HSG Plaintiff, ORDER OF PARTIAL SERVICE;

DISMISSING CERTAIN DEFENANTS

v. AND CLAIMS WITH PREJUDICE;

DISMISSING CERTAIN DEFENDANTS

RON BROOMFIELD, et al., WITH LEAVE TO AMEND Defendants. 12 Plaintiff, an inmate at San Quentin State Prison (“SQSP”) has filed a pro se action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. His complaint (Dkt. No. 1) is now before the Court for review under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. Plaintiff has been granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis in a separate order. DISCUSSION A. Standard of Review A federal court must conduct a preliminary screening in any case in which a prisoner seeks redress from a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. See 28 U.S.C. §1915A(a). In its review, the court must identify any cognizable claims and dismiss any claims that are frivolous, malicious, fail to state…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.