Eidler

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA San Francisco Division STACIA STINER, et al., Case No. 17-cv-03962-HSG (LB)

Plaintiffs,

DISCOVERY ORDER

v. Re: ECF Nos. 255, 256, and 257 BROOKDALE SENIOR LIVING, INC., et al., 15 Defendants. 16 The parties filed three discovery letters raising two disputes: (1) whether the plaintiffs are impermissibly seeking new discovery or instead are permissibly following up on existing requests for production and (2) the timing and scope of ESI production. The court can decide the disputes without oral argument. N.D. Cal. Civ. L. R. 7-1(b). For dispute one, the plaintiffs’ requests are not new, and the parties must resolve the defendants’ objections through the court’s discovery procedures. For dispute two, within one week, the defendants must say when they will produce the 2020 ESI. The court denies the plaintiffs’ request for ESI from 2021. 24 1. Requests for Production — ECF Nos. 255 and 257. In the letter briefs at ECF Nos. 255 and 257,…