Martin
Martin v. Muniz
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
GEORGE MARTIN,
Case No. 17-01690 BLF (PR) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING
MOTION FOR
13 v. RECONSIDERATION; ADDRESSING OTHER
REQUESTS
W. MUNIZ, et al.,
Defendants. (Docket Nos. 173, 174, 175)
18 Plaintiff, a California inmate, filed the instant pro se civil 19 rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, against prison 20 officials at the Salinas Valley State Prison (“SVSP”). The Court 21 granted Defendants’ motion for summary judgment on the Eighth 22 Amendment deliberate indifference to serious medical needs 23 claim against them. Dkt. No. 169. Plaintiff has filed a motion 24 for reconsideration under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 59 25 and 60(b)(1-6), Dkt. No. 175, along with exhibits in support, Dkt. 26 No. 175-1. 27 order (e.g., after dismissal or summary judgment motion), a 1 motion for reconsideration may be based either on Rule 59(e) 2 (motion to alter or amend judgment) or Rule 60(b) (motion for 3…