Costantini
Sequoia Benefits & Insurance Services LLC v. Costantini
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SEQUOIA BENEFITS & INSURANCE
SERVICES, LLC,
No. C 20-08089 WHA Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER DENYING PARTIAL LUCIANO COSTANTINI, et al., MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION 14 Defendants.
16 17 Trade secret claimant Sequoia Benefits & Insurance Services, LLC sought and received leave to move for reconsideration of a prior order denying a motion to file Sequoia’s Exhibit G under seal (Dkt. Nos. 80, 83). Both parties having been heard, the request is DENIED. “A motion for reconsideration should not be granted, absent highly unusual circumstances, unless the district court is presented with newly discovered evidence, committed clear error, or if there is an intervening change in the controlling law.” Marylyn Nutraceuticals, Inc. v. Mucos Pharma GmbH & Co., 571 F.3d 873, 880 (9th Cir. 2009). A clear error involves “[a] manifest failure by the Court to consider material facts or dispositive legal arguments . . . . ” Civ. L.R.…