Alden

Alden v. AECOM Technology Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 3, 20215:18-cv-03258California2,072 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 PETER ANGELO ALDEN, Case No. 18-cv-03258-SVK

Plaintiff, ORDER ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTIONS v. FOR RECONSIDERATION OF (1) SUMMARY JUDGMENT ORDER AECOM TECHNOLOGY AND (2) ORDER DENYING STAY CORPORATION, et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 188, 189 Defendants. 12 On April 14, 2021, the Court issued an order granting Defendant AECOM Technology Corporation’s motion for summary judgment, and the Court entered judgment in favor of AECOM. Dkt. 179 (the “SJ Order”), 180 (Judgment). Plaintiff subsequently filed three administrative motions: (1) motion for a temporary stay (Dkt. 182); (2) motion to extend time for notice of appeal (Dkt. 183); and (3) motion to extend time for post-judgment motions (Dkt. 184). The Court denied the motion to stay, but granted Plaintiff a 30-day extension of the deadline to file a notice of appeal and a 7-day extension of the deadline to file a post-judgment motions. Dkt. 186 (the “Stay…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.