Dunn

Dunn v. Santa Cruz County

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 3, 20215:21-cv-02091California429 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 GREGORY EDWIN DUNN, Case No. 21-cv-02091-BLF

Plaintiff,

ORDER REVOKING IN FORMA

v. PAUPERIS STATUS

SANTA CRUZ COUNTY, [Re: ECF 18] Defendant.

13 Plaintiff Gregory Edwin Dunn was granted leave to proceed in this case in forma pauperis. See ECF 5. Plaintiff’s complaint and first amended complaint were screened and dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915, and after the second screening the action was dismissed with prejudice. See ECF 13, 14. Plaintiff filed a notice of appeal on June 1, 2021. See ECF 16. On June 2, 2021 the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit referred the case back to this Court “for the limited purpose of determining whether in forma pauperis status should continue for this appeal or whether the appeal is frivolous or taken in bad faith.” ECF 18. “An appeal may not be taken in forma pauperis if the trial court certifies in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.