Meyer

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 JOSEPH JAMAUL JOHNSON, Case No. 19-cv-02345-SI (pr)

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

v. DENYING IN PART MOTION FOR

SUMMARY JUDGMENT, AND

J. CERMENO, et al., SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE Defendants. Re: Dkt. No.

13 14 This is a pro se prisoner’s civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 in which Joseph Jamaul Johnson alleges that defendants violated his Eighth Amendment rights when they failed to protect him and failed to adequately address his medical needs. Defendants now move for summary judgment on the ground that Johnson failed to exhaust administrative remedies for his claims against them. For the reasons discussed below, defendants’ motion for summary judgment will be denied as to the failure-to-protect claims and granted as to the medical-care claim. The court will set a briefing schedule for a further dispositive motion from the remaining defendants. 22 …