Seh-v-Nancy Berryhill

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 8, 20214:18-cv-00885California1,506 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 LO MEI SEH, Case No. 18-cv-00885-DMR

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE PLAINTIFF’S COUNSEL’S

v. MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES

NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Defendant.

Plaintiff Lo Mei Seh filed a complaint seeking to reverse the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration’s administrative decision to deny her application for benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 401 et seq. The court granted in part Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and remanded the case for further proceedings. [Docket No. 21.] Following remand, an Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) found that Plaintiff is disabled and entitled to past- due disability benefits. Plaintiff’s counsel Harvey Sackett now moves for an award of attorneys’ fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b). [Docket Nos. 26-1 (“Mot.”), 30 (“Reply”).] The Commissioner filed an analysis of the fee request. [Docket No. 29 (“Response”).] Having carefully considered the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.