Jurado

Jurado v. Ramirez

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 10, 20214:20-cv-08602California897 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ROBERT JURADO, Case No. 20-cv-08602-HSG

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART SECOND

v. EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE

SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT;

A RAMIREZ, et al., DENYING REQUEST FOR COUNSEL

AND FOR LEGAL ADVICE

Defendants. Re: Dkt. No. 19

13 Plaintiff, an inmate at San Quentin State Prison, has filed a pro se action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff has filed a letter requesting a second extension of time to file his second amended complaint, requesting appointment of counsel, and requesting legal advice. Dkt. No. 19. The Court addresses the requests below. DISCUSSION I. Request for Second Extension of Time to File Second Amended Complaint Plaintiff’s request for a second extension of time to file his second amended complaint is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. Dkt. No. 19. Plaintiff has requested a 60-day to 90-day extension of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.