Silverman
Silverman v. Napa State Hospital
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JACOB S. SILVERMAN, Case No. 18-07620 BLF (PR) Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR
v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT
NAPA STATE HOSPITAL, et al.,
Defendants. (Docket No. 25)
18 Plaintiff, a California inmate, filed a pro se civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 19 1983, against the Napa State Hospital, also referred to as the California Department of 20 State Hospitals – Napa (“DSH-Napa”), for unsanitary conditions. Dkt. No. 8. After 21 several dismissals with leave to amend, Plaintiff filed an amendment naming two individuals as defendants: Supervisors Erin Sherman1 and Ken Maifeld. Dkt. No. 12.
24 1 When Plaintiff failed to provide an address where Defendant Sherman could be served, the Court dismissed the claims against this defendant under Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and terminated him from the action. Dkt. No. 26. 26 2 Plaintiff identified this Defendant as Ken “Maiseld,” Dkt. No. 12, but Defendant’s …