Hill

Hill v. Batchley

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 14, 20214:20-cv-06428California513 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CYMEYON V. HILL,

Case No. 20-cv-06428-YGR (PR) Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S v. MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION; AND REOPENING CASE

M. BATCHLEY, et al.,

10 Defendants.

This civil rights action filed by Plaintiff, who is a civil detainee, was dismissed without prejudice by the Court on November 16, 2020. Dkt. 3. The Court concluded that dismissal was required because Plaintiff failed to submit a timely application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) by the October 22, 2020 deadline as set by the Clerk’s notice dated September 14, 2020. Id. at 1. Plaintiff now seeks reconsideration of the dismissal by filing motion for reconsideration under Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Dkt. 6. He has also filed a completed non-prisoner IFP application. Dkt. 7. Where the district court’s ruling has resulted in a final judgment or order, a motion for 20…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.