Kyle Zoellner v. Eric Losey

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 14, 20213:18-cv-04471California3,868 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 KYLE CHRISTOPHER ZOELLNER, Case No. 18-cv-04471-EMC (DMR)

Plaintiff,

ORDER ON MOTION TO COMPEL

v. Re: Dkt. No. 111 CITY OF ARCATA, et al., Defendants.

Plaintiff Kyle Zoellner alleges civil rights claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Defendants City of Arcata (“City”), several City officials, and several City police officers. [Docket No. 106, Fifth Amended Complaint (“5AC”).] On January 8, 2021, Plaintiff issued a subpoena to the District Attorney for the County of Humboldt (“DA”). The DA did not respond. Plaintiff now moves to compel compliance with the subpoena. [Docket Nos. 111 (“Mot.”), 129 (“Reply”).] The DA filed a notice of non-opposition. [Docket No. 124.] Defendants oppose. [Docket No. 126 (“Opp.”).] The court held a hearing on May 27, 2021, which the DA attended as an interested third party. For the reasons stated below, the motion is granted subject to the conditions described below. I. BACKGROUND A. Allegations and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.