Hanrahan

Hanrahan v. Statewide Collection, INC.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 14, 20213:19-cv-00157California5,322 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 LEAH HANRAHAN, Case No. 19-cv-00157-MMC

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

v. DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR ATTORNEY'S FEES STATEWIDE COLLECTION, INC., AND COSTS Defendant.

12 Before the Court is plaintiff Leah Hanrahan’s (“Hanrahan”) “Motion for Attorney’s Fees and Costs,” filed March 25, 2021. Defendant Statewide Collection, Inc. (“Statewide”) has filed opposition, to which Hanrahan has replied. Having read and considered the papers submitted in support of and in opposition to the motion, the Court rules as follows.1 BACKGROUND2 After Hanrahan “incurred a medical debt with Mad River Hospital,” her “bill” was sent to Statewide for collection, whereupon Statewide sent her a collection letter, dated January 23, 2018. (See FAC ¶¶ 6-8; see also Compl. Ex. A.) According to Hanrahan, the collection letter was “false, deceptive and misleading” (see id. ¶…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.