Hill

Hill v. Mendosa

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 14, 20214:20-cv-07375California827 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CYMEYON V. HILL,

Case No. 20-cv-07375-YGR (PR) Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S v. MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION; REOPENING CASE; AND DIRECTING

DIETICIAN MENDOSA, PLAINTIFF TO COMPLETE NON-

PRISONER APPLICATION FOR Defendant. LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

This civil rights action was dismissed without prejudice by the Court on December 7, 2020. Dkt. 3. The Court concluded that dismissal was required because Plaintiff failed to submit a timely application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) by the November 30, 2020 deadline as set by the Clerk’s notice dated October 21, 2020. Id. at 1. Plaintiff now seeks reconsideration of the dismissal by filing motion for reconsideration under Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Dkt. 5. Where the district…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.