Rauda

Rauda v. Jennings

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 14, 20213:21-cv-03897California3,981 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 WILLIAN MATIAS RAUDA, Case No. 21-cv-03897-CRB

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

v. TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER;

EXTENDING ADMINISTRATIVE STAY

DAVID JENNINGS, et al., Defendants.

On May 24, 2021, Willian Matias Rauda petitioned this Court for a writ of habeas corpus “to enjoin Respondents Department of Homeland Security (DHS) from executing his deportation.” See Pet. (dkt. 1) ¶ 1. He now moves for an emergency temporary restraining order, which would “enjoin” the government “from removing” Mr. Matias until the Court rules on his habeas petition. See Second Mot. for TRO (dkt. 10) at 9. The Court has administratively restrained the government from deporting Mr. Matias pending the Court’s ruling on his motion for a TRO. Because 8 U.S.C. § 1252(g) deprives the Court of jurisdiction to hear Mr. Matias’s claims, the Court denies Mr. Matias’s motion. But given the severe harm that Mr. Matias will face if…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.