Kurisu

Kurisu v. Svenhard Swedish Bakery Supplemental Key Management Retirement Plan

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 17, 20213:20-cv-06409California2,036 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 KERRY KURISU, et al., Case No. 20-cv-06409-EMC

Plaintiffs,

ORDER DENYING BAKERY

v. DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS

SVENHARD SWEDISH BAKERY Docket No.

SUPPLEMENTAL KEY MANAGEMENT

RETIREMENT PLAN, et al.,

Defendants.

13 14 Plaintiffs are Kerry Kurisu, Douglas Prola, and Bill Pruitt. Each worked for Svenhard’s Swedish Bakery (“Swedish Bakery”) for more than 30 years. They have filed suit because they were promised pension benefits pursuant to the Svenhard’s Swedish Bakery Supplemental Key Management Retirement Plan (the “Plan”) but they have not been paid those promised benefits, at least not in full. Plaintiffs have sued the following defendants: • The Plan; • Ronny Svenhard, David Kunkel, James Kohles, and Michelle Barnett, each of whom was allegedly a plan administrator and/or fiduciary of the Plan; and • the Bakery Defendants (United States Bakery, Mountain States…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.