Meniooh

Meniooh v. Humboldt County

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 31, 20211:20-cv-05634California3,873 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EUREKA DIVISION 7 RAHTAH MENIOOH, Case No. 20-cv-05634-RMI

Plaintiff,

ORDER ON MOTION TO DISMISS

v. Re: Dkt. No. 19, 26 HUMBOLDT COUNTY, et al., Defendants.

13 Now pending before the court is a Motion (dkt. 19) filed by Defendants, the County of Humboldt and Kristin Ellis (“Defendants”), seeking dismissal of Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) (dkt. 11) without further leave to amend; also pending before the court is Plaintiff’s Motion (dkt. 26) to file a Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”). For the reasons stated below, the Defendants’ request for a dismissal with prejudice is granted, and Plaintiff’s Motion is denied. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND Plaintiff alleges that he is the father of a girl (“I.M.”) who was one-year-old at the time of the subject incident. See FAC (dkt. 11) at 1, 4. Plaintiff’s child, I.M., resided in Plaintiff’s home at the time, along with the mother and a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.