Meniooh
Meniooh v. Humboldt County
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EUREKA DIVISION 7 RAHTAH MENIOOH, Case No. 20-cv-05634-RMI
Plaintiff,
ORDER ON MOTION TO DISMISS
v. Re: Dkt. No. 19, 26 HUMBOLDT COUNTY, et al., Defendants.
13 Now pending before the court is a Motion (dkt. 19) filed by Defendants, the County of Humboldt and Kristin Ellis (“Defendants”), seeking dismissal of Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) (dkt. 11) without further leave to amend; also pending before the court is Plaintiff’s Motion (dkt. 26) to file a Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”). For the reasons stated below, the Defendants’ request for a dismissal with prejudice is granted, and Plaintiff’s Motion is denied. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND Plaintiff alleges that he is the father of a girl (“I.M.”) who was one-year-old at the time of the subject incident. See FAC (dkt. 11) at 1, 4. Plaintiff’s child, I.M., resided in Plaintiff’s home at the time, along with the mother and a…