Do
Do v. Saul
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
DAVID D.,
Case No. 20-cv-02696-JSC Plaintiff, 8 v. ORDER RE: CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
ANDREW SAUL,
Re: Dkt. Nos. 15, 16 Defendant.
12 Plaintiff seeks social security benefits for a combination of physical impairments, including: back pain, neck pain, and numbness and weakness in his extremities. (Administrative Record (“AR”) 65-72, 246, 277, 283, 321.) Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), Plaintiff filed this lawsuit for judicial review of the final decision by the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”) denying his benefits claim. Now before the Court are Plaintiff’s and Defendant’s motions for summary judgment. (Dkt. Nos. 15 and 16.) After careful consideration of the parties’ briefing, the Court concludes that oral argument is unnecessary, see N.D. Cal. Civ. L.R. 7-1(b), and the Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s motion, DENIES Defendant’s cross-motion, and …