RingCentral, Inc. v. Nextiva, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RINGCENTRAL, INC., Case No. 19-cv-02626-NC Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING

v. RINGCENTRAL’S MOTION FOR

SUMMARY JUDGMENT, AND

NEXTIVA, INC., et al., GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART NEXTIVA’S

Defendants. MOTION FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT

15 Re: Dkt. Nos. 202, 204

It is a rainy day for cloud-based communications companies. Before the Court are two motions for summary judgment in this business torts case: first, plaintiff and counterclaim-defendant RingCentral, Inc.’s motion for summary judgment on Nextiva’s counterclaim, and second, defendant and counterclaimant Nextiva, Inc.’s motion for summary judgment on RingCentral’s complaint. See Dkt. Nos. 202 (“Nextiva MSJ”), 204 (“RC MSJ”). The Court finds that as to RingCentral’s motion, there are triable issues of fact pertaining to all of Nextiva’s counterclaims. As to Nextiva’s motion, the Court finds that there is no genuine dispute as to the claims involving allegedly…