Hassell

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KENT HASSELL, Case No. 20-cv-04062-PJH Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

v. DENYING IN PART MOTION TO

DISMISS FIRST AMENDED

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., COMPLAINT AND DENYING MOTION

TO STRIKE CERTAIN CLASS

Defendant. ALLEGATIONS Re: Dkt. No.

Defendant Uber Technologies, Inc.’s d/b/a Uber Eats (“defendant”) motion to dismiss plaintiff Kent Hassell’s (“plaintiff”) first amended complaint (“FAC”) and strike certain class allegations came on for hearing before this court on May 6, 2021. Plaintiff appeared through his counsel, Shannon Liss-Riordan. Defendant appeared through its counsel, Andrew Spurchise. Having read the parties’ papers and carefully considered their arguments and the relevant legal authority, and good cause appearing, the court hereby GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART defendant’s motion to dismiss and DENIES defendant’s motion to strike. …