Nguyen

Nguyen v. Pelosi

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 17, 20215:20-cv-08755California705 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

MAI-TRANG THI NGUYEN, Case No. 20-CV-08755-LHK

Plaintiff, ORDER DISMISSING SECOND

AMENDED COMPLAINT WITH

v. LEAVE TO AMEND

NANCY PELOSI, Speaker of the United Re: Dkt. No. 11, 19, 20 States House of Representatives, and MITCH MCCONNELL, Minority Leader of the United States Senate, Defendants. 19 Plaintiff’s pro se Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”) claims that Speaker Nancy Pelosi 20 and Senator Mitch McConnell (together, “Defendants”) have violated the U.S. Constitution’s 21 Treason Clause, Art. III, § 3, cl. 1. See SAC at 3, ECF No. 11. The crux of Plaintiff’s SAC is that 22 Defendants negligently “fail[ed] to do their jobs as top government officials to vindicate the 23 results of the coronavirus-infected [p]resident[ial] [e]lection of 2020.” Id. at 6.1 Thus, as Plaintiff

25 1 In denying Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis, the Court held that Plaintiff’s original complaint (ECF No. 1) and first…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.