Nguyen
Nguyen v. Pelosi
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN JOSE DIVISION
MAI-TRANG THI NGUYEN, Case No. 20-CV-08755-LHK
Plaintiff, ORDER DISMISSING SECOND
AMENDED COMPLAINT WITH
v. LEAVE TO AMEND
NANCY PELOSI, Speaker of the United Re: Dkt. No. 11, 19, 20 States House of Representatives, and MITCH MCCONNELL, Minority Leader of the United States Senate, Defendants. 19 Plaintiff’s pro se Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”) claims that Speaker Nancy Pelosi 20 and Senator Mitch McConnell (together, “Defendants”) have violated the U.S. Constitution’s 21 Treason Clause, Art. III, § 3, cl. 1. See SAC at 3, ECF No. 11. The crux of Plaintiff’s SAC is that 22 Defendants negligently “fail[ed] to do their jobs as top government officials to vindicate the 23 results of the coronavirus-infected [p]resident[ial] [e]lection of 2020.” Id. at 6.1 Thus, as Plaintiff
25 1 In denying Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis, the Court held that Plaintiff’s original complaint (ECF No. 1) and first…