Young

Young v. Berryhill

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 14, 20214:18-cv-01721California1,416 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 MARY ANN YOUNG, Case No. 18-cv-01721-DMR

Plaintiff,

ORDER ON MOTION FOR

v. ATTORNEYS’ FEES

NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Re: Dkt. No. 27 Defendant.

Plaintiff Mary Ann Young filed a complaint seeking to reverse the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration’s administrative decision to deny her application for benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 401 et seq. The court granted Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and remanded the case for further proceedings. [Docket No. 21.] Following remand, an Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) found that Plaintiff is disabled and entitled to past- due disability benefits. Plaintiff’s counsel Katherine Siegfried now moves for an award of attorneys’ fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b). [Docket Nos. 27 (“Mot.”), 29 (“Reply).] The Commissioner filed an analysis of the fee request. [Docket No. 28 (“Response”).] Having carefully considered the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.