Dizdar

Johnson v. Dizdar

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 22, 20215:20-cv-08314California3,761 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

11 SCOTT JOHNSON, Case No. 20-CV-08314-LHK 12 Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

DISMISS v. Re: Dkt. No.

MARY ANN DIZDAR.

15 Defendant.

Plaintiff Scott Johnson (“Plaintiff”) alleges that Defendant Mary Ann Dizdar (“Defendant”) violated the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) (42 U.S.C. § 12101 et. seq.) and the Unruh Civil Rights Act (“UCRA”) (Cal. Civ. Code §§ 51–53). Before the Court is Defendant’s motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s complaint. ECF No. 13. Having considered the parties’ submissions, the relevant law, and the record in this case, the Court DENIES Defendant’s motion to dismiss. I. BACKGROUND A. Factual Background Plaintiff is a California resident with level C-5 quadriplegia. ECF No. 1 (“Compl.”) ¶ 1. He “uses a wheelchair for mobility and has a specially equipped van.” Id. “Plaintiff is also a serial ADA litigant who [as of December 2020] ha[d] filed over 1100…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.