Perez
Perez v. Indian Harbor Insurance Company
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
*NOT FOR PUBLICATION* 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 IGNACIO PEREZ, Case No. 4:19-cv-07288-YGR
Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR
RECONSIDERATION OF ORDER ON MOTION
v. TO STAY
INDIAN HARBOR INSURANCE COMPANY, Re: Dkt. No. 87 Defendant.
16 In the related matter, Perez v. Rash Curtis & Associates, No. 4:16-cv-03396-YGR, (N.D. 17 Cal.) (“Perez I”), a jury verdict was entered that each member of the class shall recover from 18 defendant the amount of $500 per call made in violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection 19 Act (“TCPA”), for an aggregate award in favor of the class of over $267 million. (Dkt. No. 347.) 20 On October 25, 2020, the Court approved the October 11, 2019 assignment, which assigned to the 21 class Rash Curtis & Associates’ (“Rash Curtis”) bad faith claim against its insurer, Indian Harbor 22 Insurance Company (“Indian Harbor”). (Dkt. No. 392.) 23 In this action, Ignacio Perez is now seeking to recover monies against Indian Harbor. (See…