C. G. v. Soledad Unified School District

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 26, 20215:19-cv-06196California3,348 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 JAMES GOODELL, et al., Case No. 19-cv-06196-VKD

Plaintiffs,

ORDER RE MOTIONS IN LIMINE

v. 10 Re: Dkt. Nos. 104-111 SOLEDAD UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al., 12 Defendants.

13 The Court held a pretrial conference in this matter on June 23, 2021. Dkt. No. 130. This order resolves the parties’ motions in limine. Dkt. Nos. 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111. The Court will issue separate orders regarding the parties’ proposed jury instructions (Dkt. No. 117, Exs. 6(a), 6(b)) and other matters discussed during the pretrial conference.1 I. PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION IN LIMINE NO. 1 A. Heather Goodell’s Employment with the District Plaintiffs move for an order excluding any evidence regarding Heather Goodell’s employment as a substitute teacher with the District. Dkt. No. 105. They argue that evidence of her conduct, personality traits, and performance as a substitute teacher, and specifically any evidence that she…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.