Eidler

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA San Francisco Division STACIA STINER, et al., Case No. 17-cv-03962-HSG (LB)

Plaintiffs,

DISCOVERY ORDER

v. Re: ECF No. 269 BROOKDALE SENIOR LIVING, INC., et al., 15 Defendants. 16 INTRODUCTION The parties dispute whether Brookdale’s response to the following interrogatory was adequate: “Please identify ANY and ALL FACILITIES that were ALTERED after January 26, 1992.”1 The court can decide the issue without oral argument. Civ. L. R. 7-1(b). The response is adequate because Brookdale has produced the information it has, and answering the interrogatory more specifically would require Brookdale to compile a summary. Brookdale produced 12,000 pages — including floor plans, blueprints, and spreadsheets — to address the issue. The plaintiffs want a more specific response because many documents were undated, and Brookdale did not identify them as “as-built” or modified. The plaintiffs want 26 27 1 Letter Brief – ECF…