Proofpoint, Inc. v. Vade Secure, Incorporated

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 24, 20213:19-cv-04238California4,197 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 PROOFPOINT, INC., et al., Case No. 19-cv-04238-MMC

Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFFS' v. MOTION TO EXCLUDE TESTIMONY

OF EXPERT WITNESSES

VADE SECURE, INCORPORATED, et al., 12 Defendants.

13 Before the Court is plaintiffs Proofpoint, Inc. ("Proofpoint") and Cloudmark LLC's ("Cloudmark") Motion, filed April 23, 2021, "to Exclude Testimony of James Pooley, Anthony Ferrante, Christopher Bakewell, Dr. Paul Clark, and Dr. Aaron Striegel." Defendants Vade Secure, Inc. and Vade Secure SASU (collectively, "Vade Secure") and defendant Olivier Lemarié ("Lemarié") have filed opposition, to which plaintiffs have replied. Having read and considered the parties' respective written submissions, the Court rules as follows.1 By the instant motion, plaintiffs seek to exclude the testimony of five defense expert witnesses. The Court considers in turn the arguments made as to each expert. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.