Villasenor

Jackson v. Villasenor

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 28, 20213:20-cv-08695California2,972 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 DOUGLAS V. JACKSON, Case No. 20-cv-08695-EMC

Plaintiff,

ORDER OF SERVICE

v. Docket No. 13 VILLASENOR, et al., Defendants.

12 13 I. INTRODUCTION Douglas V. Jackson filed this pro se civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 to complain about events and omissions at the Correctional Training Facility in Soledad. His second amended complaint is now before the Court for review under 28 U.S.C. § 1915. This order directs service on the Defendants. II. BACKGROUND Mr. Jackson’s second amended complaint alleges the following about events and omissions that occurred at the Correctional Training Facility in Soledad: On May 5, 2018, correctional officer (C/O) Villasenor asked Mr. Jackson where he was from and did not like Mr. Jackson’s answer that identified Jackson’s housing unit. Docket No. 13 at 6. Mr. Jackson apparently had misunderstood the question to be an inquiry about his…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.