PG&E Corporation v. AECOM Technical Services, Inc..

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JH KELLY, LLC, Case No. 20-cv-05381-HSG Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS IN PART AECOM'S FIRST v. AMENDED COUNTERCLAIM AECOM TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC.., Re: Dkt. No. 48 et al., 11 Defendants. 12 Pending before the Court is PG&E’s motion to dismiss certain claims in AECOM’s First Amended Counterclaim. Dkt. No. 48 (“Mot.”). AECOM has filed an opposition, Dkt. No. 60 (“Opp.”), and PG&E has filed a reply, Dkt. No. 63 (“Reply”). The Court finds this matter appropriate for disposition without oral argument and the matter is deemed submitted. See Civil L.R. 7-1(b). For the following reasons, the Court GRANTS the motion to dismiss with LEAVE TO AMEND as to AECOM’s claims for negligent misrepresentation, fraudulent concealment, quantum meruit, implied contractual indemnity, and contribution/apportionment. I. BACKGROUND This construction dispute arises out of the Burney K2 Replacement Project (“Project”), …