Usens, Inc. v. Chongqing Junma New Energy Automobile Co., Ltd.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 22, 20215:19-cv-00315California902 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 USENS, INC., Case No. 19-cv-00315-BLF

Plaintiff, ORDER RE DEFENDANT'S MOTION v. IN LIMINE

CHONGQING JUNMA NEW ENERGY [Re: ECF 51] AUTOMOBILE CO., LTD., et al., 11 Defendants. 12 In preparation for trial, which is set to begin on July 16, 2021, Defendant Chi Shi filed one motion in limine. See Mot., ECF 51. The Court rules as follows, for the reasons set forth below and as stated on the record at the June 17, 2021 pretrial conference.

DEFENDANT CHI SHI’S MOTION IN LIMINE NO. 1 RE: EXCLUSION OF

WITNESSES AND EVIDENCE NOT DISCLOSED

18 Mr. Shi moves to exclude Ping Sui and Yue Fei from testifying as witnesses on the basis 19 that neither was timely disclosed. Mot. 1-3. Further, Mr. Shi moves to exclude any evidence 20 related to or underlying the calculation of specific economic damages claimed by Plaintiff uSens, 21 Inc., on the basis that uSens never provided a computation of damages as required by Fed.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.