Jocelyn Trigueros v. Stanford Federal Credit Union

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 28, 20215:21-cv-01079California5,680 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 JOCELYN TRIGUEROS, Case No. 21-cv-01079-BLF

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

v. REMAND

STANFORD FEDERAL CREDIT UNION, [Re: ECF 17] Defendant.

12 Plaintiff Jocelyn Trigueros brings this putative class action against her former employer, 13 Defendant Stanford Federal Credit Union, for violations of California wage and hour laws. See Decl. of Patrick Stokes, Ex. A, Compl., ECF 1-2. Defendant removed the action to federal court under the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005 (“CAFA”), 28 U.S.C. § 1332(d). See Notice of 17 Removal (“Not.”), ECF 1. Before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion to remand for lack of jurisdiction 18 under CAFA. Remand Mot., ECF 17. This matter is suitable for disposition without oral argument 19 and thus the hearing set for September 2, 2021, is vacated, and the matter is hereby submitted for 20 decision. For the following reasons, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s motion to remand. 21 I. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.