Shafer

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 SABRINA SHAFER, Case No. 19-cv-00787-CRB

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

v. SET ASIDE JUDGMENT

SKYLINE ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY SERVICES, et al., 12 Defendants. 13 This case involves an employment dispute between Plaintiff Sabrina Shafer (“Shafer”) and Defendant Skyline Advanced Technology Services (“Skyline”). The Court dismissed Shafer’s case against Skyline after Skyline’s Motion for Sanctions brought to light Shafer’s destruction of evidence. See R. & R. re Mot. for Sanctions (Dkt. 98) (“R. & R.”); Order on R. & R. (Dkt. 103). Shafer now moves to set aside the judgment in the case, arguing that Skyline was not forthcoming in its Motion for Sanctions with regard to its ability to back up the data on Shafer’s Skyline-issued laptop. See generally Mot. to Set Aside J. (Dkt. 120). As discussed below, while Shafer’s declaration is arguably timely, it is not clear and convincing evidence of fraud or other misconduct by …