Coleman

Coleman v. Fernandez

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 28, 20213:21-cv-00539California1,651 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 WENDELL COLEMAN, Case No. 21-cv-00539-SI (pr)

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

REQUEST FOR A SECOND

v. EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND

TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE; AND

LT. FERNANDEZ, et al., ADDRESSING HIS REQUEST FOR

CLARIFICATION

Defendants. Re: Dkt. Nos. 10, 11 12 On February 11, 2021, plaintiff was ordered to show cause within thirty days why this action 13 should not be dismissed under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Docket No. 5. The order identified three prior 14 dismissals that appeared to count under § 1915(g), stated that plaintiff did not appear to be under 15 imminent danger of serious physical injury when he filed the complaint, and ordered plaintiff to 16 show cause why pauper status should not be denied and the action should not be dismissed. Id. at 17 1-2. The order further stated that plaintiff also could avoid dismissal by paying the filing fee by the 18 deadline. Id. at 3. 19 On May 13, 2021, the court reset the deadline for plaintiff…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.