Bernstein

Bernstein v. United States Department of Housing & Urban Development

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 6, 20213:20-cv-02983California857 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 MARY HELEN BERNSTEIN, et al., Case No. 20-cv-02983-JSC

Plaintiffs,

ORDER RE: PLAINTIFFS’

v. OBJECTIONS TO ORDER DENYING

MOTION FOR A STAY; MOTION FOR

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL

HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT,

et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 85, 86, 87 Defendants. 12 13 Plaintiffs Mary Helen Bernstein and Elizabeth Grace Tigano, who are proceeding without an attorney and in forma pauperis, filed this discrimination action against the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development, the California Department of Fair Employment and Housing, and several individual defendants employed by these agencies. Since the action was filed in April 2020, Plaintiffs have sought, and in large part obtained, multiple extensions of time to file amended complaints. On May 27, 2021, the Court denied Plaintiffs’ request to stay proceedings for nearly a year—until March 2022, but sua sponte granted Plaintiffs an…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.