Michaeli

Michaeli v. Kentfield Rehabilitation Hospital Foundation

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 7, 20213:21-cv-03035California3,443 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 GIL MICHAELI, Case No. 21-cv-03035-EMC

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

v. MOTION TO REMAND

KENTFIELD REHABILITATION Docket No. 11 HOSPITAL FOUNDATION, et al., 11 Defendants. 12 13 Plaintiff Gil Michaeli initiated this class action in state court against the following Defendants: Kentfield Rehabilitation Hospital Foundation; 1125 Sir Francis Drake Boulevard Operating Company, LLC; and Vibra Healthcare, LLC. In his complaint, he asserted a single cause of action – i.e., a claim for violation of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (“FCRA”). Defendants removed the case, asserting federal question jurisdiction. See Not. of Removal § III.A. Mr. Michaeli now moves to remand on the basis that the Court does not have subject matter jurisdiction over his case based on lack of Article III standing. Having considered the parties’ briefs, the Court finds this matter suitable for resolution without oral argument and thus VACATES the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.