Woo
Woo v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 TONY WOO, et al., Case No. 19-cv-07042-MMC
Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT'S v. MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION
AND STAY CLAIMS OF PLAINTIFFS
AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO., WOO AND SCHWERT
INC.,
10 Defendant.
11 Before the Court is defendant American Honda Motor Co., Inc.'s ("Honda") "Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay Claims of Plaintiffs Woo and Schwert," filed February 16, 2021. Plaintiffs Tony Woo ("Woo"), Douglas P. Schwert ("Schwert"), and Daniel Rifkin ("Rifkin") have filed opposition, to which Honda has replied. Having read and considered the papers filed in support of and in opposition to the motion, the Court rules as follows.1 BACKGROUND In the operative complaint, the Second Amended Complaint ("SAC"), plaintiffs allege that Rifkin, on or about April 6, 2017, purchased a new Honda CR-V EX vehicle from a Honda dealership in Denver, Colorado (see SAC ¶ 102), that Schwert, on…